About the Authors


  • Paul Walker

    Lee Mullin

« Autodesk Quantity Takeoff (QTO) 2012 Hotfix Released | Main | So you want to be Famous? »

07/29/2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a014e87fbd82d970d01543415773e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Navisworks - AutoCAD previous version support:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Andrea Baxter

Hi Lee

Thank you. We are actually looking to have this done for a project of ours....is this a service your company provides?

Lee Mullin

Hi Andrea,

It's one we haven't yet covered in the blog but thank you for the reminder, we'll get something put together.

Lee

Andrea Baxter

Hi Paul

We are looking do something similar to this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQkDRXo7tLM&feature=related for one of our projects. Where can I get more details, pricing on this? We love it? thank you

Paul Walker

Hi Teresa, a good point worth considering. The good thing is that any of the latest DWG readers will continue to open older DWG files, and the latest Autodesk Object Enablers will load the older DWG files too. Also the 2012 standalone export utility (available now), could still be used by customers for earlier version software, so they should be OK.

The main concern would be for anyone who needs to install a 2004-2006 object enabler (where a later version of the OE doesn't exist) against future versions of Navisworks. Let us know if the gov/inf projects you're referring to fall into this category. However most third-party AutoCAD-based apps I'm aware of have released at least a 2007 OE, so again should be OK.

Thanks for the feedback.

Paul Walker

Thanks for the feedback Basam, an interesting idea. One of the drivers for considering this though is the additional impact on engineering and QA resource each new version requires, (as each old file reader has to be reconfigured and QA'd against the latest version of Navisworks).

I understand what you mean about the single installer - there are technical reasons for the current installer configuration (not my area of expertise I'm afraid), however your point is noted. Thanks.

Basam Yousif

How about you keep it, but as a separate "add-on" that people can download when needed ?

Also, can you please group all these installations into ONE line for easier uninstall ?

Teresa Martin

I think dropping support for 2004-2006 could be an issue for government clients. Government/Infrastructure projects typically have a very long scope (6-10 years). Frequently, these projects stick with the software that was used from the project's inception. This could be deal breaker for firms and government agencies dealing with older legacy data.

The comments to this entry are closed.